WELCOME TO AFFORDABLE RENTALS BRISBANE

YOU ARE INVITED TO BROWSE AS LONG AS YOU LIKE. In this blog we will write articles about the Social Security System and those issues, that affects people that rent, and also those that own properties for rent. We hope that our articles will help them understand the situation better. L S H.

Wednesday, June 14, 2023

Australia Rental affordability issues.

WELCOME TO BRISBANE AFFORDABLE RENTALS, YOU ARE INVITED. IN THIS BLOG, WE WILL DISCUSS RENTAL PROBLEMS THAT WE MAY INCOUNTER WHEN RENTING, AND THE PROBLEMS OF RUNNING AFFORDABLE RENTALS. WE WILL ALSO DISCUSS, WHAT THE GOVERNMENT CAN DO TO HELP THE RENTERS PAY THEIR RENT, AND THE OWNWES RUN A BETTER AFFORDABLE RENTAL SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY. 
Anyhow, the farmers' problem in this article is similar to the rental problem that we have today, because the social security system can help both, if the assets test is modified. So, we are writing several articles, where we will talk about the rental problems and the Social Security System. 




We believe that there are many types of properties for rent, of course some cost a lot to rent, like this one in the photo, but there are also affordable properties for rent, people should look into what they can afford, and try to be happy with what they can afford. 


Welcome to our article, Australia Rental Affordability Issues. 

Dear readers, we are writing about social issues that effect our way of life, and this is blog, No. 6.

Before we write this article, we want to point out that there are not enough properties for rent, because the assets test puts the small rental owners in a disadvantaged position. 

Anyhow, in this article of Australia rental affordability issues, let us start with what we find on the news and internet, to show you what we mean. So, hereunder is a shortened report.

 The latest property data from research firm CoreLogic reveals Brisbane has recorded a 3.8 per cent rise in housing rents in the three months to the end of September — the highest rise of any Australian capital city.

As Brisbane continues to face record low vacancy rates, rents have risen by 13.5 per cent state-wide in the past 12 months.

CoreLogic research director Tim Lawless said that equates to about a $68 a week increase for a typical rental dwelling, or $3,536 annually. (End of report).

Well, I hope you see what we mean. So, in this article, we want to discuss rental affordability, because they say that in Australia most people cannot find rental accommodation, and if they do, they cannot afford to pay for it. But what are the reasons for these days’ rental issues. It looks like that there are less property available for rent, but what could be the reason for this shortage, and what can be done to fix it.

Well, if the present government wants to fix it, they need to build more rental accommodation themselves, then rent them on low rent, perhaps at no profit at all or at a loss. But even if the government does that, will they be able to build enough rental property and solve the problem for good, I do not think they can do that, because that takes a lot of taxpayer money, and a lot of time to build enough rental properties, so, let us look at the reason why this is happening, and if anything has changed that has caused this shortage.

It looks like that in the past, when the rental property market was run from the private landlords, and there was some money to be made, these things did not happen very often, because a lot of small investors would invest on rental properties. But today there is very little profit in owning rental properties because they cost too much to run, and there are many taxes, starting from the local government, the state government, and from the federal government.

Because it is hard to make a profit, people that have money keep away from investing on rental properties. So, in this article let us try to find the reason this has happened and continue to happen. We want also to find the reasons why in the past it was better.

---------------------------------

Let us talk about the rental past. 

Rental properties in the past were more affordable, because there were more small investors in the market, they were people that had some money and instead of keeping it in the bank, they bought a rental property hoping that, when they retied, they could keep their affordable rental property rented, and they would be better off financially, in their old age, at least this is what they wanted, but today it does not work like that anymore, because of the assets test that is set far too high. 

Most of these people do not have enough money themselves, to become a self-funded retiree. So, they would rely on the government pension, for a modest living standard, but a lot of things have change, so, whoever is on a government pension, would be better off if they had no rental property.

Then, there are a lot of problems and a lot of overhead expenses to run the property. So, the small investors have stopped buying rental properties, since they give them enough trouble and very little returns. So, what went wrong one may ask? Well, let us try to answer that question.

We all know that most economies including Australia are set to run on capitalism, this type of setting requires that you need to make more money from the money you have, this works out well, when everything works the way, it is supposed to work, and you know what you are doing. But sometimes it does not work that well. This happens when unforeseen expenses pop up, and at the same time the rental market goes down, so, there is no money to be made, the worst part is when you know that you cannot make enough money, to run your properties at a profit. I believe that this is what has happened in Australia.

Now, let us see why this has happened, who are the people that are interested in the rental market, and if there is a way to fix this rental shortage. I dare to suggest that the government may have to change some laws, that permits the landlords to run the properties at a small profit, because that is the only way to have enough properties in the market. Here I am not talking about the rich people that run large luxurious holdings and can make money, from their new units on high rent, because most people cannot afford that rent. So, we are looking for affordable rentals, that the workers or the pensioners can afford.

------------------------------

Let me state my views.

I believe that there are two ways to fix the rental problem, one way is that the federal and state governments, build enough affordable rental themselves, and rent them at no profit or at a loss, and this will take a lot of taxpayer money. The other way is to copy what we did in the past, because in the past there were more affordable rentals, since it was easier for small investors to have a property for rent, without losing money. Anyhow, what I am saying here is that we may have to go back and see what has changed, and if it is necessary, change it back the way it was before, since there were more affordable properties in the past.

Now we know that the private sector, can find ways how to supply all the rental properties required, but that must be done at a profit, so, the large companies are not interested to build affordable rentals, because there is not enough profit in them, then it is the small investors that can make the difference, and because there can be a lot of small investors that can be interested, if the laws permits them to have a rental property at a small profit, or as long as they do not lose other government entitlements, like the pension, then they could be interested to own a property for rent.

Now let me explain how it is possible to lose money. Small investor X lives in his own house and has a unit for rent, soon he is going to retire and hopes to receive the government pension, if he did not have the unit for rent, he would be intituled to receive the full pension, because the other assets he has, will take him past the limit he can have, before the pension is cut. But the unit is a real problem, because the net money he can make, is a lot less than the pension he loses, and that is the real problem, so, he believes that it was better if he did not have the unit. Then the last problem are the smoke alarms. Here the government makes laws that the landlords must employ a registered company to install the smoke alarms, but it does not say how much they are allowed to charge, so, they charge a lot, this can only make the rents dear. 

This is what the government should take into consideration. So, I dare to suggest that, if the government makes laws that the small investors can make at least from their rental properties, as much money as the government pension cut, then the small investors may be willing to invest in residential units, and the problem is half solved.

Anyhow, this is one of the reasons I can see, why this rental shortage is happening. I can write other examples that can explain better the rental situation. But I hope people understand what I am saying here. The only thing I can add here is this; it looks like that the assets test is the reason why there are not enough rental propeties anymore. 

This article is becoming too long. See you in our next article, Australia Rental Problems Can Be Solved

To see more click on this link, Australia Rental Affordability Issues. 

--------------------------------------- 



Monday, June 12, 2023

The Social Security Must be equal.

WELCOME TO BRISBANE AFFORDABLE RENTALS, YOU ARE INVITED. IN THIS BLOG, WE WILL DISCUSS RENTAL PROBLEMS THAT WE MAY INCOUNTER WHEN RENTING, AND THE PROBLEMS OF RUNNING AFFORDABLE RENTALS. WE WILL ALSO DISCUSS, WHAT THE GOVERNMENT CAN DO TO HELP THE RENTERS PAY THEIR RENT, AND THE OWNWES RUN A BETTER AFFORDABLE RENTAL SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY. 
Anyhow, the farmers' problem in this article is similar to the rental problem that we have today, because the social security system can help both, if the assets test is modified. So, we are writing several articles, where we will talk about the rental problems and the Social Security System. 



This photo shows people in the Centrelink office, they go there to apply for their pension, their unemployment benefit, or other benefit that people can receive from the government. In this article here, we want to point out that, ther are some anomalies that need to be fixed. 

Welcome to article, The Australian Social Security Must Be Equal

Dear readers, we are writing about social issues that effect our way of life, and this is blog, No. 5. 

In this article, we are looking for a better social security system, where everybody gets a minimum payment, which is equal to the minimum pension or unemployment benefit.

Dear readers, we believe that the Australian Social Security System must be equal for everybody, but it is not, as we have said in our previous articles, starting with, Farming Today Is Still a Risky Business, then, Australian Social Security, then, The Australian Parties, then, Australia can do better than this, and then, The Assets Test Dilemma, now in these articles we were talking about how the Australian Social Security System works and helps people. So, we have found that the Australian social security system, is good but not perfect, since some people cannot receive it for one reason or another; therefore, the social security system needs to be changed, to fix these unforeseen failures to help. Australia cannot claim to have a good social security system, when it fails to deliver help to those that need help.

Having said that, we need to study the situation and come up with an answer for this social problem, because, the Australian Social Security system, must be equal for everybody. We believe that everybody in the community must be given a minimum of help, when they need help. So, we are going to write and suggest our views, hoping that somebody important reads them and does something about it.

Now, what we want to write here is not going to be popular, because it criticises the existing social security system. Anyhow, we believe that they need to avoid what is happening to the farmers, so, they must put in place a better system, where people in need are helped, even if they own properties. 

----------------------------

Talking about the ideal social security setup

What we are writing hereunder is an idealistic way for the social security system to adapt, if they can. I said if they can, because it is unlikely that this system can be approved now, because Australia cannot afford it today, however, it is important that something like this exists. We hope that future politicians, start working on this idealistic social security system that we are talking about.

We believe that Australian citizens and residents, should be granted from the government an amount of money that is equal to the minimum government unemployment benefit or pension, it would be like receiving a small wage from the government. Now, we believe that this is what is needed in Australia, and we believe that one day can be done, if we can organise ourselves to achieve that, after all Australia is a rich country, so, we should be able to do that. Now let us see how this will affect the community and which group of people will benefit from this change.

---------------------------------

The people that can benefit from the change.

The people that will benefit from this change, are those people that today don’t receive any payment from the government, and those people that don’t receive enough, so, they are forced to live below the poor threshold. In this case the poor threshold is set, as equal to the minimum government pension that today is about, $900 per fortnight for a single person, or $700 each for a couple. This is the minimum of money that people need to live, and we believe that it must be equal for everyone.

As things stand today, there are people that must live with less than the minimum government pension, because of the anomalies in the system. One of those anomalies is caused from the assets test, where the pensioners receive a smaller pension, the rest of their earnings is supposed to come from their assets, which are supposed to earn about 7.8 %; but most of the rental properties, can only earn at most 2%, as we have shown you in our previous article, The Assets Test Dilemma, where a house valued at $650,000 did only make $8500 in a year, which is about 1.3%. So, we believe that the assets test on afforable rental properties must be set accordingly, if the government believes that we need mums and dads to invest in rental properties and keep the Australian real estate going.

You see, people believe to invest in rental properties, but soon they will become aware that to own a second house, can be a problem when they apply to receive their pension, because the assets test will reduce their pension more than what they can earn from them. 

My views are that the assets test on rental properties, must be set at a level, where it is possible for the owners, to earn at least as much as they loose from the pension. Now my views are that the assets test on rental properties should be one third of what they are now, so that the pensioners will lose one dollar per thousand, instead of three dollars per thousand. But even this might not be enough, you see if you have a property valued at one million dollars, you cannot receive any pension. The question here is; will this property earn the owner about $24,000 per year net. I don’t think so. Anyhow, these are our views.

-----------------------------

The property owners’ other problems. 

As we have said in our previous articles, to own a rental property is a problem and not a benefit, because people lose their pension or unemployment benefits, so, to own a second property is not the way we should plan for better retirement, since the assets test reduces the pension payments 3 times as much as you can earn from your properties.

But there are more negative things in owning a rental property, the worst of all is the land-tax. The land-tax in Queensland is $1.7 per thousand, this means that if you have land valued it one million dollars, every year you must pay $17,000 to the government just because you own this land. They don’t give you anything at all, you just must pay, because they need the money.

Some people still believe in owning properties, because their price go up all the time, so, they think that they are better off having properties, you see, they don’t realize that there is this gain tax that will take away all their earnings and more, let me give you this example.

You own a rental house that you have bought several years ago for $250,000, which was the right market price, today you must sell the rental house, because you need to move to another town, where houses are about the same value, so, you think that it will be easy; you sell the house for $650,000 and you buy another one about the same price. But that is not going to happen, because the $400,000 dollars that you have gained is taxable. This is called the gain tax, which may well be around $100,000, it is hard to be more specific. So, in this case you may lose $100,000 dollars because of the gain tax.

The figures in this article, might not be correct, but they are close enough to what they are supposed to be for showing our views.

This is all I can say today; this setup is not fair for anybody that owns properties, because those properties in the assets test, cannot earn half the money that they will receive from the government pensions or other benefits, if they had no properties. So, for them it would have been better to have no properties; since the assets test affects the pension and other benefit adversely, starting from the farmers, as we have said in, Farming Today Is Still a Risky Business.

So, people are discouraged to own properties and to save for rainy day, THAT IS THE REASON WHY TODAY THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH AFFORDABLE RENTAL PROPERTIES. We believe that the ASSETS TEST MUST BE ABOLISHED, Or reduced and be set in a way that gives the property owners a chance to earn at least as much money as they lose, from the government benefit. It is not fair that people lose money because they have worked hard and saved money.

Anyhow, we believe that everybody should be treated in the same way from the goverment social security system. But they are not, and that is why there are problems, starting with the rental market.

I hope that somebody in the government reads my articles, and then thinks what can be done to make them fair, for those people that have worked hard.

See you in next article, Australia Rental Affordability Issues.

To see more klick on this link, The Australian Social Security Must Be Equal

------------------------ 



Thursday, June 8, 2023

The Assets Test Problem.

WELCOME TO BRISBANE AFFORDABLE RENTALS, YOU ARE INVITED. IN THIS BLOG, WE WILL DISCUSS RENTAL PROBLEMS THAT WE MAY INCOUNTER WHEN RENTING, AND THE PROBLEMS OF RUNNING AFFORDABLE RENTALS. WE WILL ALSO DISCUSS, WHAT THE GOVERNMENT CAN DO TO HELP THE RENTERS PAY THEIR RENT, AND THE OWNWES RUN A BETTER AFFORDABLE RENTAL SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY. 
Anyhow, the farmers' problem in this article is similar to the rental problem that we have today, because the social security system can help both, if the assets test is modified. So, we are writing several articles, where we will talk about the rental problems and the Social Security System. 




In this article we will be talking about affordable rentals. What you see in this photo, is a typical house for rent, let us say in Brisbane. It could be rented between $400 to $500 per week, this sounds good for the landlord, but there a lot of expences that the owners must pay to the local authorities and to the Queensland government, as we will show you hereunder.  


Welcome to our article, The Assets Test Problem

How the assets test punishes property owners.

Dear readers, we are writing about social issues that effect our way of life, and this is blog, No. 4. 

Now let me explain, sometimes the assets test prevents people in need to receive help from the government. Anyhow, we started to write these articles about what is happening in Australia, when we saw that the farmers were having problems to survive, because of the drought, so, we thought that the Australian government should help. But they cannot help the farmers, because they own properties and the assets test exclude them from government help. In a parallel way, this is what happens to other property owners that are excluded also, and we think that this is not right. This is what we are going to write in this article.

I believe that we have suggested that the farmers, with some government help, need to make something like a collective farming association, where all the farmers can pool a percentage of their farming products and money, which should be tax free from the government, then this pool can be used to help each other when they need help.

We hope that somebody high up reads our suggestion and then do something about it, we hope they do. We also noted that the farmers cannot ask help from the government, because they are self-employed and because they have properties, so, their property are assets that stops them from receiving help from the government.

We believe that, the assets test is a real problem, because it is hard to know, at what level is the right level to apply, as we will see as we continue to write about it; but that is only part of the farmers problem, because also they cannot ask any government assistance since they are self-employed. But when one cannot make money for a long time, and here in the case of the farmers we are talking about years, I think that it would be fair to help them. But the farmers are not the only people that are affected from these government rules of the assets test, because there are other groups of people that are affected adversely as well.     

Anyhow, today in this article, beside talking about the farmers, we are going to talk about the assets test for other groups, and above all we are going to talk about the assets test, how it affects rental property owners in a more detailed way than we have done in our other articles, and then, about other unfair government taxes levied on properties. 

The assets test punishes rental properties owners. 

The assets test is a problem for the pensioners, because it does not consider, if it is possible to earn the same amount of money that will be cut off the pension. The main problem here is that, when the treasurer makes the budget, he doesn’t even look at this possible outcome, he just wants to save money and cut the pensions. In fact, nobody is thinking about this negative issue of the assets test. I would say that the entire population thinks that people that own any rental property are rich people, so, they don’t need the government pension, when rental houses are a real problem with pensioners that own one rental house only, because if they get a government pension, the pension will be cut off so drastically that they would have been better off, if they didn’t have the house at all. I believe that the assets test on rental properties, is set three time as much as it should be for the small property owner to break even, and this is what I am going to show you in this article, where I will make it clear with an example.  

Anyhow, before I write about that, I am going to suggest that to fix this injustice about today assets test, which discriminate heavily against the small rental property owners, because it puts them financially in a disadvantaged position, the only thing that comes to my mind is that whoever makes these budget and laws, must keep in mind that he should give these properties owner a fair go, if he wants to keep the Australian economy going the best way possible, and I can say here, that this is the reason why today there are not enough affordable properties for rent. 

I believe that the aim of any budget, is to achieve the best benefit for the country, I believe that to achieve you need people that are self-starter and work hard, like the small property owners that have worked hard during their lives and have paid their taxes on what they have earned. They saved some money and invested it on a second house, hoping that when they would retire, they could be better off financially, but it did not work the way they wanted, because of the unfair assets test changes that the Australian government has made recently. You see, these self-starter people need to believe that if they work hard, they will be better off in the future.

Here I can only say; what is wrong with the people in Canberra? Don’t they see that they are killing the will of the people that want to progress by working hard? This is the second most important group of people that work physically hard; the first group is the workers that work for a wage. This first group of people politically belongs to the Labour Party, these people are happy to work for a fair wage, and if they own their house they live in, so, they are not self-starters.

The second group of people, the small property owners that are usually hard-working people and self-starters can belong to both parties; so, if the coalition wants more votes from this group and stay in government, they need to fix the mistakes they have made, when they changed the assets test in a way that punishes severally anyone that gets a government pension. I say punishes them severally, as I am going to show you, how the assets test and other things discriminate against the pensioners, so, it makes life very hard for them, and they would be better off, if they had no rental properties to rent. Anyhow, read my views about how the assets test discriminate against the small property owners, in the example I am writing hereunder.

 -------------------------

 

The assets test punishes small property owners. 

Now let us talk about how today assets test discriminate and punishes financially the small property owners. To show you that, hereunder we have written an example. So, we have chosen a couple that we call Mr. and Mrs Smith, they are both pensioner and receive a government pension. The figure that appears in this example are all rounded figures, but they are close to the real figures.

Now, let us write this example.

Mr Don Smith and his wife are both on government pensions, but today they don’t get much pension, because of the assets test. The Smith couple thinks, and I believe that, the only way one could describe today assets test is that whoever made these laws are cruel people, because the assets test discriminates against those small property owners that own a house for rent, since it is not possible to live on the money that their property can earn, so, let us see how it works. One of the problems exist because of the deeming setup, where the government calculate that people can earn $3.00 per fortnight per every thousand dollars you have in the bank, or anywhere else including properties. In fact, owning properties is the worst thing you can have, because it affects the owners in a disadvantaged way, like the Smiths that we are talking about here. 

The house they rent is valued at $850,000, plus a few more belongings their assets test are nearly 900,000 dollars so, they only get about $100 per fortnight each, because of the assets test.

Now, if they didn’t have their rental property, they would get the full pension, which would have been, $802 each per fortnight each.

Now, let us try to calculate how much the Smiths can earn from their rental property in Brisbane. This property is an old three-bedroom house, on a large block of land that is valued at $650,000, this house is rented at $500.00 PW, so, if they are lucky and the house is rented the entire year, they would collect $26000 this is before expenses.

Now, what are the average expenses for this house; The Brisbane City Council rates are $600.00 per quarter; the Urban Utilities average $450.00 per quarter; this will come to $4200.00 per year; the insurance is $1200.00 per year, the land tax (this may vary, but let us say that they have to pay it fully in this example) so, the tax can be up to 11000; maintenance can vary, but let us say $1500.00, then there is the fee for the real estate agent say $1500.00 per year.

Let us add this numbers up. So, $4200 to Brisbane city Council rates and water +1200 insurance+11000 Queensland government land tax +1500 maintenance+ 1500 to real estate agent letting fee, it = $19,400

Calculate total net earnings for the year, is $26000 income-19400 expenses=$6600

The Smiths have made $6600 net in one year. Do you think they can live on that? Here some people may say that not everybody pays the land-tax, but even without the land-tax, the Smiths will only earn $17,600.00 from their rental property.

This is a lot less than if they were on the government pension, which would have been nearly $41,700.00 for both.

But now they only get 23,000.00 at the best, and all the trouble to rent their property.

I believe that these negative things must not happen, it is not right when you have worked hard to put yourself in a better financial position, then suddenly you find yourself worse off. Because some government idiots have made this huge mistake. This is the reason why today there are not enough rental properties for rent. And if they want the private investor to help them, they must remove the assets test from affordable rental properties. 

Well, somehow, I have had my say, and I hope that it is clear enough what I have said. So, see you in my next article, which will be about, The Australian Social Security Must Be Equal

To see more click on this link, The Assets Test Problem

------------------------------------

Tuesday, June 6, 2023

The Australian social security.

WELCOME TO BRISBANE AFFORDABLE RENTALS, YOU ARE INVITED. IN THIS BLOG, WE WILL DISCUSS RENTAL PROBLEMS THAT WE MAY INCOUNTER WHEN RENTING, AND THE PROBLEMS OF RUNNING AFFORDABLE RENTALS. WE WILL ALSO DISCUSS, WHAT THE GOVERNMENT CAN DO TO HELP THE RENTERS PAY THEIR RENT, AND THE OWNWES RUN A BETTER AFFORDABLE RENTAL SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY. 
Anyhow, the farmers' problem in this article is similar to the rental problem that we have today, because the social security system can help both, if the assets test is modified. So, we are writing several articles, where we will talk about the rental problems and the Social Security System. 



The Australian Social Security System is a great government system that helps people in need. Their staff are very patient people, and they do a great job with a smile if you need help. But they can only help those people that qualify. And under the present laws lots of people don't qualify. 



Anyhow, there are a lot of people that go to the Centrelink office, like you see in this photo above, they want to see what help they can get from the government, when they have financial problems. But they need to belong to certain groups to qualify for help, they can be unemployed and looking for work, they can be sick people, they can be pensioners to see what bension they can get from the government, and many other groups, but certain groups do not qualify, as we will dicuss hereunder. 

Welcome to our article, Australian Social Security  

Dear readers, we are writing about social issues that effect our way of life, and this is blog, No. 3. 

(This article was published the first time in 2018)

Dear readers, this is an old article from our Hub Pages articles, where we talk about the “Australian Social Security System”, that was failing to help the farmers. Anyhow, we are repeating this to compare it with what is happening today, so, let us see what we wrote then. We started by writing, why the Australian Social Security fails to help the farmers; then we will also discuss other things where they fail. But first let us discuss about the farmer, because as we have said in a previous article Farming Today Is Still a Risky Business, so, we want to work out, why the farmers don’t get social security payment from the government, like most other people do.

You see, today the Australian Social Security system is helping lots of people, but it is not helping the farmers, even though the farmers really need help from the government. Therefore, we want to know why this is happening, and then, we can suggest how to avoid this happening again. We believe that the Social Security system in Australia must help anybody that needs help, at least the name itself suggests that. So, we are going to investigate and talk about this issue, in this article and the following articles.

Anyhow, our views are based on what is happening in Australia today, about farming and the drought, so, the first question is; why the Australian Social Security system has failed to help the farmers. We believe that the Australian Social Security can do better than what it is doing now. So, let us see why the Australian social security is failing to help the farmers.

Now, what we are saying here is what we know, but, if you want to know more about the Australian Social Security system, you should follow these links, Social security in Australia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_security_in_Australia, Benefits and Payments - Australia.gov.au, and other links that can be found on the internet.

Anyhow, we believe that the Australian Social Security system that we call Centrelink, has failed to help the farmers, because it has not been planned to help them from the beginning, as we will explain as we go on writing these articles. Anyhow, we are talking about the drought and the farmers that are having a very hard time, so, we were saying that all this hardship can be minimized, if aids from the Social Security System was more readily available to the farmers, but it is not, so, the only thing that we can think about this failure, is why the social security has failed to help? Because it is not fair for the farmers, so, the present Social Security System needs to be fixed.

So, why the social security has failed to help? Once you ask that question and look for the reasons, you realize that in Australia not everybody is treated the same, from the current social security system. You see, people are treated different because they belong to different categories; there are: the-have and the-have-not; there are the workers that work for wages; there are the self-employed; there are the farmers, which we could say are self-employed, and others; anyhow, when people go to Centrelink the Social Security government agencies for help, the agencies do what they can according to where these groups of people belong, so, let us see some examples how this works.  

---------------------------------- 


Now, there are thousands of Centrelink offices like this in Australia. The federal government keeps them open to help those people that need to apply for unenployment benefits, sickness benefits, all sorts of government pensions, and other government issues. 

How the Social Security System works. 

Let us start from the working people; when people that work for a wage, become unemployed and they are not earning any money, they can go to Centrelink, where they can apply to receive the unemployment benefit from the government; this means that the government gives them some money, until they find another job to go to and can earn their living. This system is called Social Security unemployment benefits, or something like that, and it is good, it is like receiving a small wage to help you survive, so, it helps the workers when they don’t have a job and need financial help, which is good.

But the problem with this system is that all categories are not treated the same, which is not good. So, I believe that something needs to be done, to help anyone that needs help. You see, some categories may not receive help because they belong to a certain category, even if they earn no money and have no money, like the farmers today, this is the problem with the Social Security system of today.

You see, the farmers cannot turn to the government for help, because they are self-employed, and they are supposed to be rich, okay they are rich, because they own a lot of land, so, the assets test will exclude them from any government help; in this case there is no social security for the farmers. This is the reason why the social security system is failing the farmers, it is not set to help those people that cannot earn money even when they work hard, in the hope they can earn their living. Therefore, the Australian Social Security System needs to be changed. 

Because I believe that these people must be helped, because they are the backbone of the Australian economy, therefore, we cannot afford to lose them, so, the Social Security system needs to be adjusted to help them when they need help. They must be helped from the government, until the day that something else can replace the government help; like the collection of funds that we have suggested in our last article. Here we need also to say, that today farming is not regulated from the government, but some regulations may need to be placed; so that when things don’t work out, the government will be more willing to help the farmers.

Anyhow, we have worked out that today the farmers cannot be helped from Centrelink, because they are self-employed, and because they have too much property as assets. You see, the assets-test is the main problem here; but I believe that the assets-test in special cases should not override the income test completely, this suggestion does not apply only to the farmers, because the assets-test is also making life miserable to pensioners that own properties, when those properties cannot earn half the money the assets test believe they could.

So, in my views the assets test needs to be modified. Anyhow, we are going into details later, anyhow, it will become self-explained as we write more articles about it. We want to say now that there are issues that need to be fixed from the federal government. So, this farmer’s problem and the assets-test for pensioner, is going to be a real problem for the politicians, if they want to help the people that have voted for them at the elections.

--------------------------------------

 Let us look at the political reasons. 

Anyhow, I want to point it out to you, that in our previous articles we have started to talk about the farmers problems, but slowly we found ourselves to talk about assets-test and politics. Now, what is happening at the Australian federal government level is not right, they need to work better what the people need, and how the people are affected when they make their budgets, I believe that this is one of the reasons why Australia is having problems today, some of these political people that become treasurers are heartless and careless, they have made many mistakes that has affected the public adversely, some of these mistakes need to be fixed, the public is not going to forget easily what they have done, so, they are going to run the risk of losing their next elections, on this issue alone. But let us compare what is happening now to the past. I believe that in the past it was better, at least this is the way I have seen it happen.

Anyhow, in the past as far as I know there was no assets test in the seventies, it was introduced later to stop people that were abusing the system, also because the government needed more money. Now, let us try to see and discuss some of the reasons that apply today, which takes us to see that the federal government is greedy, because they want more money. So, here we need to look at who are the people that make these decisions.

Of course, they are the politicians that we send to Canberra parliament to govern us, since the government is formed from the political parties. Now it becomes evident that it is what these political parties represent, believe and preach that are going to make the future laws and budgets that parliament will pass, to govern Australia. And believe me not everything that they will pass is garanted to work. 

Anyhow, this is a shortened version of our original articles, so, we will miss a couple of articles about the Australian politics, and The Australian Political Parties. So, we will go straight to the assets test promlem, since this applies to the rental sector, so, it is the main issue that we want to talk about, in the following articles, The Assets Test Dilemma, followed by The Australian Social Security Must Be Equal. then we will contine with newer articles. 

To see more click on this link, Australian Social Security  

--------------------------